An exposé on the Covid-19 bioweapon, state complicity, and the people’s stand for truth
Part I – The Crime
Premeditated Murder: How Covid-19 Was Weaponized Against the People
When governments across the world rolled out the Covid-19 vaccine campaign, they called it “safe and effective.” But behind the slogans, the truth was deliberately buried.
Adverse event definitions were quietly rewritten. Any death or injury within the first two weeks of injection was excluded from official counts — creating the illusion of safety while real harm piled up. People died within days of receiving the shot, but their deaths were erased as “coincidence.”
The United States’ own Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) documented hundreds of thousands of injuries and tens of thousands of deaths. Yet even VAERS managers admitted those numbers represent only a fraction of the true toll. If this is the visible tip of the iceberg, how large is the hidden mass beneath the water?
Common sense alone reveals the fraud. If a medical product requires the redefining of “adverse effects” to exclude its immediate dangers, then it is not medicine. It is a weapon.
Across Canada and around the world, hundreds of thousands of cease-and-desist notices were issued by the people. These notices warned governments, health officials, police, and media: stop the coercion, stop the experimentation, stop the crimes against humanity. They invoked international law, natural law, and common sense.
The response was not accountability. It was silence, ridicule, and retaliation. Scientists and whistleblowers were smeared. Citizens were mocked. Truth was buried under propaganda.
The conclusion is unavoidable: the Covid-19 vaccine rollout was not a public health campaign, but a premeditated act of harm and murder.
Receipts & Data Portals (Readers: Verify Firsthand)
- VAERS official data portal (U.S.): vaers.hhs.gov/data.html (CDC describes VAERS as a passive system with known underreporting).
- EU EudraVigilance search: adrreports.eu
- UK Yellow Card reporting: yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk
- Canada vaccine safety (archived/official dashboards): health-infobase.canada.ca
- FDA/CDC briefings & releases (Pfizer/FDA records): FDA COVID-19 Vaccines
Context matters: VAERS is designed for signal detection; CDC notes both under/over-reporting biases exist. Readers should examine raw entries, time-to-event, and case narratives instead of headlines.
Part II – The Complicity
How Police, Politicians, and Media Worked in Unison to Bury the Truth
The crime could not have succeeded alone. It required enablers — institutions willing to enforce, justify, and promote it.
Police were transformed into mandate enforcers. Instead of serving communities, they became the blunt instrument of the state — handing out tickets, threatening fines, and enforcing unlawful restrictions. When challenged, their excuse was predictable: “I have a family to support.” But ordinary people had families too, and many lost livelihoods, health, and even lives under these mandates.
Municipal leaders joined the chorus. Instead of defending their towns, they weaponized false accusations. Residents were smeared with baseless claims — from water theft to unlawful trespass. Councillors and mayors used fear and rumor to shape public opinion, while refusing to retract discredited allegations.
And the media? They did not investigate with skepticism; they amplified fear cues and a one-note “safe and effective” script while downplaying uncertainty, debate on origins, and signal-detection data. Governments openly deployed high-emotion campaigns designed to increase compliance—for example the UK’s national TV spots urging people to “look them in the eyes,” a strategy mirrored in behavioural papers advising that the “perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased” to drive adherence (SPI-B, UK Gov PDF). In the U.S., official pages repeated the “safe and effective” line (CDC; CDC benefits) while the same government also acknowledged that its principal adverse-event system is a passive one with underreporting (CDC Surveillance Manual, VAERS). Transparency over vaccine records had to be litigated—courts ordered the FDA to accelerate disclosures (2022 order; 2024 ruling report). Meanwhile, media framed early discussion of lab-origin as taboo—even as later U.S. assessments acknowledged the possibility (e.g., DOE “low confidence,” FBI “moderate confidence”)—a split summarized here: Time.
How the Cover-Up Narrative Ran (Receipts)
- Fear-first messaging: UK government’s emotive “look them in the eyes” ads; behavioural paper recommending increasing perceived threat (SPI-B PDF).
- One-slogan science: CDC pages reinforcing “safe and effective” (how they work, benefits), even as safety surveillance caveats note underreporting in VAERS (CDC VAERS manual).
- Transparency by lawsuit: federal court orders compelled faster release of FDA vaccine records (Jan 2022 order; docket summary; Dec 2024 report).
- Origins debate suppressed, then hedged: Intelligence community split acknowledged publicly (DOE “low confidence” lab-leak; FBI “moderate confidence”), after long media resistance (overview; WSJ).
Official press note for this campaign: GOV.UK.
The result was a coordinated campaign of fear and narrative control. Those who questioned or refused were painted as dangerous “agitators,” even when their only act was declining unlawful orders. Evidence that complicated the script—safety-signal caveats, court-ordered transparency, or legitimate debate on origins—was minimized in favour of compliance messaging.
This was not governance. This was complicity in Genocide. Police, politicians, and media of the World acted in unison to preserve the illusion of authority—at the expense of the people they were supposed to serve. These are acts of war, domestic terrorism, and crimes against humanity by accomplices in what many view as the largest medical and political catastrophe of this generation.
Senate-style hearing: Doctor testifies on the dangerous side effects of COVID vaccine & dissent
Context examples of public testimony & counter-narratives: readers should weigh witness statements, raw data, and press framing side-by-side.
Part III – The Reckoning
Why the People Must Disassociate from a Criminal Cartel Defunct Government System.
Here lies the central question: Why would anyone continue to associate with a system that has revealed itself to be criminal?
How can an officer stand on the roadside issuing tickets for “highway traffic violations,” wagging their finger at citizens — while ignoring the government’s role in an orchestrated campaign of coercion and harm? How can judges preside over petty cases while dismissing mountains of evidence of crimes against humanity? How can politicians claim moral authority when their complicity is written in lies and in blood?
They cannot. Not morally. Not lawfully. Not in the eyes of the people.
Disassociation is not rebellion. It is self-preservation. It is the refusal to lend consent to a system that has proven itself corrupt beyond repair. When governments wage war on their people — whether through bioweapons, coercion, or propaganda — obedience is not virtue. Obedience is betrayal.
The people have already acted. They issued cease-and-desist notices. They refused unlawful mandates. They withdrew their consent.
The governments of Canada and the World, its media arms, and its enforcement agencies no longer govern with legitimacy. They govern through fear, coercion, and deceit.
And the people are under no obligation to associate with criminals.
Forensic evidence of the Bioweapon is available
Context examples of public testimony & counter-narratives: readers should weigh witness statements, raw data, and press framing side-by-side.
National Citizens Inquiry Testimonials April 3, 2025
Context examples of public testimony & counter-narratives: readers should weigh witness statements, raw data, and press framing side-by-side.
Final Word
A crime is a crime. Complicity is complicity. An Accomplice is an Accomplice. Silence is consent.
Those who continue to serve this system will one day face the same question as the police officer on the roadside: Why did you enforce the petty while ignoring the deadly? Why did you protect your employer while abandoning your people?
The answer will not matter. The people already know.
And the people will not forget.
WHY WE THE PEOPLE DISASSOCIATE
We the People no longer recognize the legitimacy of the so-called Governments of Canada and the world, its agencies, and its enforcement arms of the defunct corporations. Our disassociation is not an act of rebellion, but an act of conscience, reason, and survival.
1. The Collapse of Moral Authority
Law enforcement and government actors continue to enforce petty infractions (traffic tickets, licensing, taxation, regulatory fines), while simultaneously ignoring — or worse, facilitating — mass crimes:
- Premeditated deployment of the Covid-19 bioweapon injections.
- Lockdowns that destroyed livelihoods and families.
- Mandates that coerced bodily harm under duress.
- Censorship and intimidation of whistleblowers and truth-tellers.
Dr. David Martin PhD – Murder Charges Coming Soon ! 2024
Context examples of public testimony & counter-narratives: readers should weigh witness statements, raw data, and press framing side-by-side.
No government has the moral right to “wag its finger” at the people for minor technical violations when it stands accused of genocide, treason, and crimes against humanity.
2. Hypocrisy and Double Standards
An ordinary person missing a license renewal is criminalized. A government official knowingly pushing a deadly injection is protected. Police will arrest a mother for unpaid fines, but will not arrest politicians or pharmaceutical executives for premeditated murder. This hypocrisy shatters all legitimacy.
3. The Principle of Disassociation
When a structure is corrupt from the root, remaining inside it makes one complicit. To continue participating in or obeying such a system is to give consent to its crimes. We the People therefore withdraw our consent to be governed by criminal actors. We will not finance them, empower them, or legitimize them.
4. The Common-Sense Position
Would you accept a known arsonist writing your fire code? Would you obey a thief demanding your bank balance? Would you bow to a murderer lecturing you on safety? Then why should anyone accept enforcement of petty infractions from those complicit in the greatest medical and political crime in living memory?
5. The Law of Higher Duty
Natural Law and Common Law recognize that allegiance to truth, justice, and life supersedes allegiance to corrupt authority. Disassociation is the lawful and moral response of a free people refusing to aid or abet criminals masquerading as leaders.
Template: Notice of Disassociation
Use: Copy, personalize, and serve/notarize as you see fit. Keep records (service dates, names, badge numbers, file numbers). Disclaimer: Provided for informational purposes only. A.I. Truth News and authors accept no liability for use/misuse or outcomes. You are solely responsible for your actions and jurisdictional compliance.
NOTICE OF DISASSOCIATION By: _____________________________________ (Full legal name) To: _____________________________________ (Agency/Official/Corporation) Date: ____________________________________ Location: ______________________ 1) I, the undersigned, hereby withdraw my consent to be governed by, contract with, or otherwise associate with any entity or agent engaged in coercion, medical experimentation, unlawful mandates, censorship, or acts amounting to crimes against humanity. 2) This notice is served pursuant to Natural Law, Common Law, and the supremacy of International Human Rights norms including (without limitation): the Nuremberg Code; the Geneva Conventions; the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court; and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 3) I object to and reject any presumed adhesion contracts, compelled performance, or de facto obligations arising from the above-referenced unlawful policies, mandates, or acts. 4) Demands: (a) Cease and desist any and all attempts to compel medical procedures, data collection, travel restrictions, or other deprivations of rights and property. (b) Remove my name/data from any program or list associated with such acts. (c) Provide written confirmation of compliance within 14 days. 5) Notice to principal is notice to agent. Notice to agent is notice to principal. Without malice, without ill will, under necessity, reserving all rights. ____________________________________ _________________________________ Signature Print Name Witnessed/Notarized by: ___________________________________________________ Seal/Stamp (if applicable) Service Details (how/when/where/whom): ____________________________________ Acknowledgment/Tracking #: ________________________________________________
Helpful references for citation inside your notice:
Nuremberg Code •
Geneva Conventions •
Rome Statute •
UDHR
CONCLUSION
We the People are not anarchists, lawless, or chaotic. We uphold the highest principles of truth, fairness, and human dignity.
But we will no longer pretend that criminals have authority over us.
Until real justice is served, every demand from such institutions is null, void, and rejected.
Receipts & Primary Documents
- Cease-and-Desist (full PDF): CD-Canada.pdf
- International Common Law Court Verdict (PDF): VERDICT-INTERNATIONAL-COURT-2.pdf
- Nuremberg Code (scanned publication): Download
- Geneva Conventions (ICRC): Overview
- ICC Rome Statute: PDF
- UDHR (United Nations): UN page
- VAERS data portal: vaers.hhs.gov/data.html • EU: adrreports.eu • UK: yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk